mirror of
https://github.com/babichjacob/ac-qu-ai-nt.git
synced 2025-10-02 04:47:53 -04:00
docs: link to issue for starting to test MSRV in CI
This commit is contained in:
@@ -28,4 +28,4 @@ To be more specific about what a breaking change _could_ entail:
|
|||||||
- the program (wrongly) exiting, panicking, reporting an error, etc, where it didn't previously
|
- the program (wrongly) exiting, panicking, reporting an error, etc, where it didn't previously
|
||||||
- changing the expected result of an existing integration test (not sure if unit tests would count)
|
- changing the expected result of an existing integration test (not sure if unit tests would count)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
All the crates in this project have a [minimum supported Rust version (MSRV)](https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs/2495-min-rust-version.html) of 1.76, the release succeeding [the one that stabilized `async fn` in traits](https://blog.rust-lang.org/2023/12/28/Rust-1.75.0.html) (which the `core` crate of this project is expected to make use of). I intend to test this in CI (GitHub Actions) in the future to identify if it ever gets raised by changes but I have not set this up yet. Raising the MSRV will be considered a breaking change --- my justification is that it [seems more appropriate for an application like this](https://github.com/matklad/once_cell/issues/201#issuecomment-1257213601). This may be reconsidered if [Cargo's MSRV-aware resolver](https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs/3537-msrv-resolver.html) is stabilized.
|
All the crates in this project have a [minimum supported Rust version (MSRV)](https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs/2495-min-rust-version.html) of 1.76, the release succeeding [the one that stabilized `async fn` in traits](https://blog.rust-lang.org/2023/12/28/Rust-1.75.0.html) (which the `core` crate of this project is expected to make use of). I [intend to test this in CI (GitHub Actions) in the future](https://github.com/babichjacob/ac-qu-ai-nt/issues/5) to identify if it ever gets raised by changes but I have not set this up yet. Raising the MSRV will be considered a breaking change --- my justification is that it [seems more appropriate for an application like this](https://github.com/matklad/once_cell/issues/201#issuecomment-1257213601). This may be reconsidered if [Cargo's MSRV-aware resolver](https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs/3537-msrv-resolver.html) is stabilized.
|
||||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user